How does a field of possibilities become a particular conscious experience, and how do different subjects come to describe a shared world? This conceptual essay develops a multidimensional probability framework that connects these questions without treating speculative metaphysics as established physics. Its strong ontological proposal is that conscious observation participates in the actualization of possibilities across multiple temporal or dimensional domains. A related multiple conscious collapse hypothesis considers whether different subjects could actualize different experiences from a common potential. The essay distinguishes this proposal from a weaker account of context dependent interpretation, which can be investigated without assuming that consciousness changes physical measurement outcomes. Using conceptual analysis and a selective examination of relevant literature, it separates quantum measurement, cognitive probability, subjective time, and social agreement. It introduces a schematic representation of experiential selection, identifies missing definitions in the physical hypothesis, and outlines prospective studies of judgment order, duration estimation, and convergence during dialogue. These studies would assess the psychological component and would not establish the existence of additional dimensions or consciousness induced quantum collapse. The contribution is a set of explicit conceptual distinctions and evidential requirements for interdisciplinary debate. The framework remains provisional, with its strongest claims awaiting an independently specified mechanism and discriminating physical predictions.
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219. https://consc.net/papers/facing.html
Cogitate Consortium, Ferrante, O., Gorska-Klimowska, U., Henin, S., Hirschhorn, R., Khalaf, A., Lepauvre, A., Liu, L., Richter, D., Vidal, Y., Bonacchi, N., Brown, T., Sripad, P., Armendariz, M., Bendtz, K., Ghafari, T., Hetenyi, D., Jeschke, J., Kozma, C., ... Melloni, L. (2025). Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness. Nature, 642(8066), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08888-1
Droit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H. (2007). How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.008
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLOS ONE, 5(8), Article e12166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012166
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 865–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013). Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001525
Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44
Wang, Z., Solloway, T., Shiffrin, R. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2014). Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(26), 9431–9436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407756111
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715–775. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715
Select and copy the citation format of your choice to cite this work in your academic publications.
Göçer, H. (2026). Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038
Göçer, H. (2026). Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038
Göçer, H. (2026). Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), 66-79. doi:10.5281/zenodo.23371038
Göçer, H. (2026). Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), 66-79. doi:10.5281/zenodo.23371038
Göçer, Hakan. "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework." AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 2026, pp. 66-79, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer, Hakan. "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework." AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 2026, pp. 66-79, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer, Hakan. 2026. "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework." AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research 1, no. 1: 66-79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer, Hakan. 2026. "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework." AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research 1, no. 1: 66-79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer, H. (2026) 'Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework', AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), pp. 66-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer, H. (2026) 'Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework', AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research, 1(1), pp. 66-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
H. Göçer, "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework," AI-Driven J. Interdiscip. Soc. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66-79, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
H. Göçer, "Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework," AI-Driven J. Interdiscip. Soc. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66-79, 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.23371038.
Göçer H. Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven J. Interdiscip. Soc. Res.. 2026;1(1):66-79.
Göçer H. Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework. AI-Driven J. Interdiscip. Soc. Res.. 2026;1(1):66-79.
@article{ger2026aijisr,
title = {{Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework}},
author = {{Göçer, Hakan}},
journal = {{AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research}},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {66-79},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23371038},
url = {https://aijisr.org/articles/AI-JISR-2026-0007}
}
TY - JOUR
TI - Consciousness Subjective Time And Shared Reality In A Multidimensional Probability Framework
AU - Göçer, Hakan
JO - AI-Driven Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Research
VL - 1
IS - 1
SP - 66
EP - 79
PY - 2026
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23371038
UR - https://aijisr.org/articles/AI-JISR-2026-0007
ER -